Stop the Injunctions on KPFA about proposed injunctions against Occupy Oakland activists

Stop the Injunctions on KPFA’s Letters and Politics

http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/77409

Injunction coverage starts at Minute 25

This is a good overview of Quan’s proposed injunctions against Occupy Oakland activists and the injunctions already in place against the Fruitvale and North Oakland neighborhoods.  Even though City Council unanimously voted back in May not to issue any more injunctions in Oakland and they also stated on record in November that injunctions are not effective, injunctions are popping up again, threatening to criminalize people for movement and behavior/activities.  Again, we see Oakland Police violating their own policies and using incredible violence against Oakland residents and activists and then blaming the victims.

This latest round of most public police violence speaks to how OPD and City government operates.  The discontent around jobs, housing, healthcare, education that the Occupy movement has amplified, but that has been at the core of demands that marginalized communities have been making for generations in Oakland, the OPD and City Council does not address these; they instead use police power and try to police their way out of the problem.  Policing never solves social problems.

STIC and allies like Critical Resistance are troubled by how use of the Occupy injunctions could serve to justify and perpetuate the police violence in communities in Oakland on the day to day, particularly how they police black and brown communities.

Press Release: Coalition Says No to Occupy Injunctions

For Immediate Release—January 30, 2012

Coalition Says No to Occupy Injunctions

 Press Contact:  Isaac Ontiveros

Stop the Injunctions Coalition

Ph.  510-444-0484

Oakland—During a press conference and several interviews Sunday, both Mayor Jean Quan and Oakland Police Chief Howard Jordan said they would seek to target protesters with civil “stay away” orders in an attempt to keep them from participating in Occupy Oakland activities.  Oakland’s Stop the Injunctions Coalition (STIC) is calling the OPD Chief and Quan’s plan an overt attempt to expand the use of injunctions in Oakland despite the fact that the Oakland City Council voted to prevent the expansion of civil gang injunctions pending additional assessment.

 

Oakland has already spent over $1 million on two temporary injunctions in North Oakland and the Fruitvale, targeting the movement and associations of alleged gang members.  Oakland’s gang injunctions were met with sustained protest throughout the last eighteen months and have been widely condemned as ineffective, divisive, costly, and further institutionalizing police use of racial profiling.  The OPD’s own report on the North Oakland Injunction found it to be ineffective in preventing or addressing violent harm in that neighborhood.

 

“The Mayor and OPD’s proposal to use injunctions or stay away orders against organizers is disturbing in many different ways,” says Rachel Herzing of the Stop the Injunctions Coalition. “They are openly targeting and criminalizing the political activity of Oakland residents.  They are proposing using a police tool that has been repeatedly debunked and that the city council has specifically voted against expanding.  What’s more, they are proposing that the notoriously violent OPD, which is on the brink of federal receivership, be given yet another tool to expand their powers against this city’s residents.”

 

In opposing the North Oakland and Fruitvale injunctions, STIC has continuously highlighted the affects of police violence on communities of color in Oakland as well as the disparities between police spending and education, sustainable housing, and healthcare spending.  “The discontent around jobs, budget cuts, housing, and healthcare that are being amplified worldwide by the Occupy movement have been at the core of demands that marginalized communities have been making for generations” says Maisha Quint, STIC member and cultural worker at Eastside Arts Alliance. “Instead of addressing the roots of the situation, the Mayor and OPD once again are trying to police their way out of the problem.  This has not worked historically, and it certainly won’t work now.”

###

 

 

Isaac Ontiveros

Communications Director

 

Critical Resistance

1904 Franklin St #504

Oakland CA 94612

510.444.0484

510.444.2177 (fax)

510.517.6612 (cell)

isaac@criticalresistance.org

 

STIC at Phat Beets! This SATURDAY

Come get your fresh and affordable vegetables and delicious fruits this weekend at Phat Beets!

57th and Market, behind the Medical Clinic.  READ ABOUT THE MARKET HERE.

While you’re there, stop by the Stop the Injunctions table to connect with ally organizations and neighbors who want to push the City to end the ineffective and costly injunctions once and for all.  We are also taking police complaints. 

STIC is tabling this Sat Jan 28 11am-2pm

and then…

Sat Feb 11 12pm-2pm

Sat Feb 25 10-2pm

City cuts social services and community jobs, while policing funds remained untouched and police actions unaccountable

How are recent Oakland financial news and city spending trade-offs connected to policing and injunctions?  When the City talks about solutions, it repeatedly puts the money behind policing, gang injunctions and other ineffective policies, while only paying lip service to real social spending and community-based services.

This month our City is making some major financial decisions that hard-hit Oakland residents, employees and communities.  Last week the mayor’s office announced that anywhere from 160 to 400 workers would be laid-off January 31st and that more than 2,500 have received pink slips. The extraordinary financial burden that OPD demands from the city, however, remained untouched: the City is still funding gang injunctions in North and East Oakland and is launching the 100-block public safety plan, ostensibly designed to target areas in the city with the highest rates of violent crime.

According to Police Chief Howard Jordan, the 100-block plan does not rely soley on increased patrols or added officers, but also shifts some of the burden to other city agencies.   The City says it also prioritizes the blocks for street repair projects, nuisance abatements and social programs. However, the city hasn’t named what those social programs are or how they are being received by the communities living in the 100-block area.  It appears that the City is only willing to put money behind policing when it talks about “solutions.”

Oaklandofficials have said that the 100-block plan, which was introduced on October 15, combines police suppression and increased collaboration with other law enforcement agencies such as the Alameda County Sheriff’s office.  STIC is deeply troubled by this: suppression tactics, which include gang injunctions and curfews, are part of a long history of racialized and violent policing that have claimed the lives of poor people and people of color living inOakland.  Further, suppression policing tactics have proved incredibly expensive for the city financially; Oakland has spent well over one million dollars (as of last October) litigating the temporary North Oakland and Fruitvale gang injunctions and, over the last ten years, has paid out more than $57 million dollars for claims, settlements and lawsuits related to Oakland Police Department actions and abuse.  Most recently in October 2011, Oakland made a $1.7million settlement payment to the family of Jerry Amaro after he was fatally beaten by the OPD.

Stop the Injunctions Coalition continues to voice loud and clear that the City must prioritize resources for things that actually bring safety to our communities, like jobs and community services, not policing.

These cuts are another example of politicians saying that the City will address public safety with a more diversified approach than policing, yet cutting funding to the diverse structure that it takes to create a healthy city. Parks and Recreation and Public Works amongst other Community and Economic Development departments will be the most heavily effected by the loss of Redevelopment money.  The Mayor and the City Council are ignoring the obvious connections between increased social services, including better access to job training and employment for those who are on probation and parole, and public safety.  Everytime there’s another shooting, members of the Council invariably bring up more parole beats, injunctions and curfews when its clear that this is notOaklandresidents want nor what will help stem the violence in our communities.

The Council and the Mayor have been repeatedly called upon by the Stop the Injunctions Coalition and other community-based organizations to take a pro-active step to a healthier city budget by de-funding gang injunctions inOaklandand to shift those resources instead to both social services and violence prevention programs. Despite the lack of political will to push injunctions forward on the part of the City Council, the City Attorney’s Office continues to use city money in the ongoing litigation of the Fruitvale injunction, which could stretch on for months.  The movement continues to build however, as we talk with each other about what real solutions look like, enact them everyday and become more connected to continue the struggle.

Visit us at the North Oakland Phat Beets market on Saturdays to talk about building the movement, connecting with ally organizations and neighbors who want to push the City to end the ineffective and costly injunctions once and for all.

STIC at Phat Beets

Sat Jan 28 11am-2pm

Sat Feb 11 12pm-2pm

Sat Feb 25 10-2pm.

 

Mural in the works for North Oakland

This mural will soon be going up in North Oakland!  Artwork collaboratively done by Oakland youth and East Oakland Xicana artist and educator, Leslie “DYME” Lopez!

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

New Year Brings More OPD Controversy, Costs: We Urge City Abandon Failed Policy

In the first weeks of the New Year, Oaklanders have been met with a flurry of news reports highlighting the costs and consequences of Oakland Police Department conduct and policy in the past year.  With two temporary injunctions in North Oakland and Fruitvale neighborhoods limping forward and still racking up costs, Stop the Injunctions Coalition is continuing its call for the City to abandon the controversial and failed policy.

 
Two weeks ago OPD officer John Hargraves was suspended for one month for purposefully obscuring his badge during an Occupy Oakland protest, and his commanding officer Lt. Clifford Wong was demoted for participating in Hargraves’ violation.  The incident was caught on video and joined dozens of other videos depicting police violence in Oakland, especially around the internationally notorious OPD raid of the Occupy Oakland encampment on October 25th.  Police actions that day alone have cost an estimated $3million and have been the subject of at least 200 citizen complaints.
 
The policing of Occupy Oakland has rightfully received international attention and condemnation, but if we want to fully understand how the OPD has comported itself in our city in the past year, we have to look at the Occupy scandals next to:
 
Indeed, until Occupy Oakland took center stage regarding police scandal, gang injunctions were a heated and controversial issues for most of 2011.  Legal costs of the injunctions have ticked over one million dollars in payment through the Oakland City Attorney’s office and to outside private counsel Meyers Nave.  While the OPD has not made public how many paid hours have been spent gathering initial data for the injunctions, testifying in court or meeting with attorneys to give statements, in November they reported that $133,089 have been spent to enforce the injunction and surveil those enjoined in North Oakland.  The November 8 report also reveals that there has been a 43% increase in Part One crimes in North Oakland with the injunction in place, contradicting the same reports claims that the injunction “improve[s] public safety, thereby providing a safer environment for residents.”
 
One thing is certain: Oakland can take a basic step forward regarding policing.  The City has the opportunity to reprioritize how it thinks about public safety, to address budget shortfall, and to curb destructive police policy.  We can begin by deauthorizing Gang Injunctions as a failed, costly, and divisive policy.